Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 1,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that the exemption applies both before and after publication (see Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at the case comes from Patrick Hughes at Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at the case comes from Patrick Hughes at Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And the Court so held in an older case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law and an editor of Inforrm     [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Thomson Reuters’ Legal Solutions blog, Patrick Hughes looks at last week’s decision in Life Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The court found that the comments concerning the drug use of Ms Rubio’s boyfriend, R.B., had related solely to the state of their relationship and had not alleged that Ms Rubio had incited him directly to take drugs. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]