Search for: "Hall v. Law"
Results 801 - 820
of 4,528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Georgia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
In Gonzaga University v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Plaintiff in this action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Plaintiff in this action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 11:03 am
That is not our law. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 3:45 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:07 am
So the jury only heard the state law claims. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
The new rule announced in Hurst v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 8:21 am
He cited a 2014 ruling from the Appellate Division, Comando v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
Puglia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
The Age had a piece “Nazi flag furore prompts move to tighten anti-vilification laws”. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
See a succinct summary of the majority’s reasoning in Vavilov by Rebecca Ross, a student at Osgoode Hall Law School, [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
On the same day Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Triplark v Northwood Hall & Ors [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB), (heard 5 December 2019). [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm
On 19 December 2019, Warby J gave Judgment in the case of Triplark Limited v Northwood Hall (Freehold) Limited (2) Philip Whale (3) David Wismayer [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In my previous post, I argued that Collins was wrong as a matter of domestic law, and of European law, and that Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015) illustrated the EU law points and undercut the reasoning in Collins. [read post]
