Search for: "Heights v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
See N.J.S.A. 2C:3-4; State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Bd. of Adjustment, Berkeley Heights, 213 N.J. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:18 pm
Parker (1954) and Kelo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:53 am
Law Lessons from SHERYL DENICOLA, n/k/a SHERYL HYER V. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
In Dion Johnson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:48 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
” Lopez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 6:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 11:36 am
Ross v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:49 pm
Tri-County Landfill, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm
One example of this can be found in People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
As we stated in State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
” They submitted evidence that out of 17,000 houses in Berkeley, only 17 exceed 6,000 square feet, 10 exceed 6,400 square feet, and one exceeds 9,000 square feet; they also asserted the proposed house would violate City Code height restrictions and general plan policies, and that an EIR was needed to evaluate noise, air quality, historic resources, and neighborhood safety impacts. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:49 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am
(See Scott v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Shaw v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Shaw v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:54 am
Source: People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:17 pm
” Larbig v. [read post]
