Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner" Results 801 - 820 of 3,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
R (on the application of Davies and another) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and R (on the application of Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 6 – 7 July 2011. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:50 am
Unemployment Insurance Board may apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel to reject an individual’s application for benefitsObafemi v Comm. of Labor, Appellate Division, 250 A.D.2d 905Suppose an employee who has been dismissed from his or her position following a disciplinary hearing applies for unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
  BCGD refers to the Ohio Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline’s Rules and Regulations, § 10 of which you can find here. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:15 pm by Christine Nielsen Czuprynski
Furthermore it reconfirms that the Durant test should not be applied in isolation, without consideration of further tests that have proliferated, such as those arising from the case of Kelway v The Upper Tribunal, Northumbria Police and the Information Commissioner (2013) EWHC HC 2575 (Admin) (see our previous blog). [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:19 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers' Compensation Opinions Body: AC28813, AC30000  Hummel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 – 28 November 2013.. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
"In Bazemore v Koehle, 169 A.D.2d 574, the Appellate Division decided that inasmuch as a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing of statement of the reasons for the termination so long as the discharge is made in good faith and without any constitutionally or statutorily impermissible motive, no defamatory impression was created and the discharged provisional employee is not entitled to a name clearing hearing.On the issue of name-clearing hearings, the… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
District Court for the Northern District of New York, Moore v Dreyer and Curley, 05-CV-1060 and Cornick v City of Saratoga Springs, Curley and Dreyer, 06-CV-0138.Dreyer served as the City's Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety. [read post]