Search for: "House v. USA" Results 801 - 820 of 1,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
Nearly Legal, a leading housing law blog, comments on such a case: Judicial review of a closed minded appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Michelle Yeary
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 2011 WL 5119441, *6 (6th Cir. 2011) (emphasis added). [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who has been involved in many investigations of the FDA. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:00 am by Alexandre Atheniense
Quem usa serviço dee-mail baseado na Web, como gmail (Google), Hotmail, Yahoo, MSN e similares, já utiliza a computação em nuvem. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
Although the leadership of the Episcopal Church (USA) may treat it as one of its member Dioceses, it has done so only to enable it to become a plaintiff in court as soon as possible. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am by Rosalind English
The Court’s reasoning The requirement under the Act that a notice of an appeal be given within the relevant permitted period meant that it had to be filed in the High Court and served on all respondents to the appeal within such period (following the decision of the House of Lords in Mucelli v Government of Albania [2009] UKHL [5], [17]. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Todd Ruger
” The Supreme Court, in January’s U.S. v Jones decision, ruled that a GPS tracking device attached to a car for weeks without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment rights to be free of searches. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Suzanne Ito
House Passes Controversial Cybersecurity Measure CISPA [Wired] "The House on Thursday approved cybersecurity legislation that privacy groups have decried as a threat to civil liberties… Its goal is a more secure internet, but privacy groups fear the measure breaches Americans' privacy along the way. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Members to express their views responsibly without fear of judicial censorship; and invites Mr Speaker to consider what action the House might take to defend its rights against such attacks“. [read post]