Search for: "Howard Bashman"
Results 801 - 820
of 932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
If you have pharma cases, this new blog, started in January, is chock full of news, apparently aiming to be to pharma what Howard Bashman's How Appealing is to lawyers;From the FDA to cigarettes --> Byron Stier notes at the Mass Torts Blog that Tobacco Companies May Not Market Cigarettes As "Low Tar" or "Light" Overseas; while on the same blog Howard Erichson discusses the ethics involved in mass tort representation;In hospital news, the… [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
(Thanks to Howard Bashman for the link.) [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:11 am
Appellate litigator Howard J. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 12:58 am
Bashman examines a recent 11th U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Commentator Bashman examines the process and the pitfalls. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:58 pm
The Appellate Judge Has an Opinion, but He's Not Sharing It
Special to Law.com
Litigator and commentator Howard Bashman examines instances in which the third judge on a federal appellate court's three-judge panel attaches to an opinion a statement that merely says, without explanation, that he or she concurs in the result. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:57 pm
Bashman weighs in on the matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Bashman shares his thoughts on the matter. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:09 am
Bashman notes some of the proposed changes that merit special attention. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:52 am
Thanks to Howard Bashman (How Appealing) for the pointer. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
If an issue is important enough to be accepted for review by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, there should be a mechanism in place to ensure that there are seven Justices to rule upon, and finally settle, the pressing question presented.Pennsylvania Law Weekly writer Howard Bashman, Esquire proposed that where a Justice is unable to sit in on a matter for one reason (or another), another appellate court judge from the Superior Court or Commonwealth Court should be allowed to… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Howard Bashman's How Appealing also provided a lengthy compilation of reactions. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Howard Bashman's How Appealing also provided a lengthy compilation of reactions. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Howard L. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 6:00 pm
New Rule 32.1 takes no position on whether unpublished opinions should have precedential value, leaving that issues for the circuits to decide.Howard Bashman of How Appealing, who has written extensively on the federal rules citability issue, wrote Nov. 27th: FRAP 32.1, permitting citation to unpublished and non-precedential federal appellate court rulings, stands as the most controversial amendment to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure of all time. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
Thanks to Howard Bashman of How Appealing blog for the alert to the petition to the Supreme Court, and for Tony Mauro of B.L.T. blog for the link to the Patently O discussion of the case.) [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:26 am
Bashman writes that, even if the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:52 am
” — from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing As health care arguments close, fate of law seems uncertain — from Law.com Oral Arguments Close With Severability, Medicaid Expansion Issues — from Joe’s HR and Benefits Blog Supreme Court Hears Final Day of Oral Argument on Severability, Medicaid Expansion — from Washington D.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:29 pm
When I started my blog back in 2002, other great bloggers — Volokh, Denise Howell, Howard Bashman, Ernie the Attorney dominated. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
(Thanks to Howard Bashman of How Appealing for the link.) [read post]
