Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 801 - 820
of 953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
This post first appeared on the Inforrm Blog, and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am
As the Inforrm blog points out, not all of the articles complained of were straightforwardly about religious doctrine: although the background was religious, there were also allegations that the claimant was a party to “conspiracies to provoke violence”. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In this feature we revisit older posts which remain of current interest. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
Edward Craven’s Inforrm post about the decision attracted a record number of hits. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:06 am
There is also an Inforrm news item. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
As the Inforrm blog points out, not all of the articles complained of were straightforwardly about religious doctrine: although the background was religious, there were also allegations that the claimant was a party to “conspiracies to provoke violence”. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Like Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post on the case, Rónán Ó Fathaight is critical of the decision, concluding All in all, the judgment in Hoffer is particularly bereft of reasoning: failing to place the statements in the context of a pamphlet, where hyperbole is to be expected; and failing to place importance on the statement being a value-judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am
This is a Media Law Update covering the last week prepared by the Legal Information Team at Matrix Chambers, which they have kindly agreed to make available to readers of Inforrm. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
We aim to post these on a LMS website which will be accessible via a link from INFORRM in the near future and so build up a database which highlights the fact that behind the tabloid headlines and celebrity culture, every day ordinary people are relying upon a funding system which allows access to justice for all. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
Regular readers of the Inforrm Blog will be well aware of the continuing debate about the circumstances in which a court should supplement an injunction preventing publication of private information with an order anonymising the names of the litigants as well. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS More Reading: The Anti-SLAPP Model (posted on Inforrm) Pigswill and public health: more bull from the EU Information is knowledge, knowledge is power Evolution of a right to freedom of information Libel reform watch Libel reform debate hots up as a new government takes advice “Unprofessional” website comment on Motown ban can be fair comment Freedom of expression the American way Filed under: Agriculture,… [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 4:21 pm
If he lived in the UK to begin with and decided to burn Korans, that would be a different position altogether, although in fact our freedom of expression protections are less robust than those in the US, and he may well have been caught under incitement of racism laws (see this post on Inforrm’s blog for more). [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 2:43 am
Today is the first birthday of the Inforrm blog – which began operation on 22 January 2010. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Over the past month, the Court of Human Rights has handed down judgment in six Article 10 cases. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
This is a Media Law Update covering the last week prepared by the Legal Information Team at Matrix Chambers, which they have kindly agreed to make available to readers of Inforrm. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:18 am
If he lived in the UK to begin with and decided to burn Korans, that would be a different position altogether, although in fact our freedom of expression protections are less robust than those in the US, and he may well have been caught under incitement of racism laws (see this post on Inforrm’s blog for more). [read post]
