Search for: "In Re Blake's Will"
Results 801 - 820
of 929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
Because Miller's sentence, as clarified by the trial court, violates the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Blakely v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 10:29 pm
Interspersed with these "contemporary" bits are re-enactments of incidents from the veteran's recollections. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:15 am
If eighteenth-century novels are history, they're women's history. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Blake. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:59 pm
Both merit re-reading as a fitting celebration of their birth and jurisprudential development. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:51 am
"There will be three separate meetings, as required to consider three different sets of resolutions submitted by Directors in three separate Notices served on the Company.The first meeting will consider a resolution submitted by seven non-executive Directors on 26 March 2004 to remove one Director, Mrs Catherine Walter, as a Director of the National Australia Bank.The second and third meetings will consider two sets of resolutions submitted by Mrs Walter on 28 March 2004 to remove… [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
"They're going out here looking for love, but they're going the wrong way about it. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:04 pm
When I ask Thomas Blake, who does the actual digitizing, how he decides which stuff to do, he laughs a little and says, "What I think is cool. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
If your field is anything like mine (Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Federal Courts, etc.) there are certain doctrines that you're compelled to teach that simply seem wrong. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
I thought it might be helpful to bring a bit of rationality to the "raw milk debate. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:48 am
"The reality is you're a dealer for profit. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:16 pm
We’re On The Same Page.Let’s Not Reinvent The Wheel.For The Time Being. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 10:24 am
Once again we're reporting on a celebrity punitive damages case. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:51 pm
David, I suspect you're right that the Supreme Court will eventually take one of these cases and overturn their prior precedent, Watts: I think that's one of the results that the Booker/Blakely revolutionaries hoped to change. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 pm
Don't we think Booker or Blakely at least suggest that this kind of thing really ain't so kosher? [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 10:30 pm
Re (Yale Law School) has posted Re-Conceptualizing Booker: How to Stop Legislatures from Circumventing the Right to Jury Trial on SSRN. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:34 am
Blake did for those millions? [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
As employed by the Court, the Blakely rule removes an incentive for legislatures to shift factfinding responsibilities away from juries and toward judges. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:50 am
They're basically out of playoff contention and playing like a team that's tired. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
As regular readers know, I have strong feelings about acquitted conduct sentencing enhancements after Blakely and Booker (and these feelings are surely impacted by the fact that I have beeing involved in a lot of post-Booker acquitted conduct appellate litigation). [read post]
