Search for: "In Re Harris"
Results 801 - 820
of 6,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2007, 12:21 am
We're not talking about that many kids in the scheme of a 3.5 million person county.Bottom line: The law is what it is and will remain that way for at least two years, probably longer. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:35 am
This announcement does nothing but re-enforce my view that just like a river, when one area of advance is blocked, the river does not go away, it just moves in a different direction. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:45 pm
Senator and Majority Leader Harry Reid is blunt. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
You’re liars, and transparent liars at that. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:05 pm
Do attorneys in Harris County fight to get the best contracts? [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:18 am
So Chelsy, if you’re reading, while Biglaw may be a safer bet than Harry and his mad family, don’t expect it to be an easy ride. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 5:07 am
And so you're seeing this sort of Trump kind of publicly emoting for poor Joe Biden and how mistreated he was, but really it's just a projection. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:18 am
We’re just not getting it. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:06 am
With LWOP, society knows EXACTLY what punishment the offender is getting, because we're all here on earth to see it. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:03 am
It also provides specific strategies to mitigate foreign company risks, by bolstering compliance, protecting IP, conducting due diligence, and re-evaluating your China footprint. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 5:52 pm
House and Senate, led by Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA), have again introduced the bill in the 116th Congress. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 8:52 pm
Now Harry is no wrongdoer here. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:21 am
Harry Reid wishes the opposite. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:41 am
Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced that he would bring the climate change legislation sponsored by Sens. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:41 pm
If you're reading this anywhere other than an RSS reader, the content has been lifted. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 1:13 pm
I'm not sure why they're so confident. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:00 pm
Rowling, is the reason we’re here today. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court changed this landscape with its eBay decision, throwing patent law back into the category of other harms -- if you wanted an injunction, you have to prove you're entitled to it. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:29 am
And maybe we're better off knowing nothing, nothing other than the art. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
That's because Nancy, Harry and Barry have been claiming this to be one of the primary goals of the legislation. [read post]
