Search for: "In re Application of Johns" Results 801 - 820 of 6,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm by Hakemi
One way to address this problem is to start the lawsuit by referring to the unidentified defendants as “John Does. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Right-On Co., Ltd., Serial No. 79011373 (March 31, 2008) [not precedential].The Board, not surprisingly, found the word HONEYSUCKLE to be the dominant portion of the registered mark. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:15 am by John L. Welch
Thus, under the facts before us, we find that the evidence of record is sufficient to support the finding that the mark NKJV mark used in connection with bibles has acquired distinctiveness.And so the Board reversed the refusal, finding that the mark has acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 8:49 pm
This misstatement reminds one of John M. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 am by John L. Welch
., Cancellation No. 92055645 (May 24, 2013) [precedential].Although this case presented an issue of first impression for the Board, it found instructive In re Glaxo Group Ltd., 33 USPQ2d 1535 (Comm’r 1993), involving abandonment of an application during ex parte examination. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:31 am by John L. Welch
News articles, advertisements, and recipes demonstrated that beer may be used as an ingredient of alcoholic cocktails.The Board disregarded applicant's arguments that its prepared cocktails will be served only in restaurants and that registrant's beer will be offered at registrant's brewery, pubs, and the like, since there are no such restrictions on channels of trade in the application and cited registration.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment… [read post]