Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 801 - 820 of 1,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2014, 11:46 am by Stephen Bilkis
Where a dismissal of a support petition is "on the merits" following a full hearing, the same interests in finality clearly are present, and no reason appears for concluding that the rules of res judicata have no role whatsoever to play. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:03 am by Karin Johnson
  When the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) took no action on the refund claim, Quality Stores initiated a proceeding in Bankruptcy Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Feb. 4, 2014) (“PRS”), and In re Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 6486921 (S.D. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Districts allowing litigation to proceed in parallel with faster PTAB challenges might soon face a jarring re-calibration of perceptions in the months ahead. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supp. 723,728 (D.N.J. 1998) (awarding fees for a foreign attorney who provided legal services to the petitioner in support of the Hague Convention petition). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:31 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
It alsoallows recognition of res judicata, if a previous extradition request was denied [2].A further application arises when extradition is not consummated by the removalof the wanted person: in such cases, a second request will not be accepted.This constitutional framework has two applications:1. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against Christ Anglican Church in Mobile, Alabama (plaintiff was the Diocese of the Central Gulf Coast---the suit settled in 2001 before trial, and Anglican congregation moved out; they built a brand-new church in 2005, while the historic Episcopal site became the cathedral of the Diocese that same year)2.-4. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
If public, they’re infringing, and if private, they’re not. [read post]