Search for: "Jacobs v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 1,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States Reuters had a piece “Sacha Baron Cohen, Showtime win dismissal of Roy Moore defamation lawsuit”. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Panels of particular interest to our readers include:Plenary: State Building: Democratic and ManagerialChair: Alice O’Connor, UCSBMeg Jacobs, Princeton University, “Reconsidering Regulation in the New Deal andBeyond”K. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law’s graphic explainer comes from Jacob Baldinger. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am by Allison Trzop
Jacobs of Greenwire reports that the ruling “could be a boon” for the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
  In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin covers the decision in Hall v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:06 am
An interesting article from Thomon Reuters News & Insight on an age-old problem in trade secrets, the fact that bringing suit often requires disclosing the trade secrets.The article concerns a case in New York state court, MSCI v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
He negotiated the deal in which the City of New York bought and renovated Yankee Stadium in 1971, when the team’s owners had threatened to leave and Mayor John V. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
  Sir Robin Jacob, giving the leading judgment, stated that a wide view was intended in the construction of the disclosure as “a function of HMRC” and could extend to the function of “raising more tax revenue“. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]