Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
See Jones v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:56 am
Jones and William L. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in Atlantic Sounding v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:01 pm
LEXIS 117673 (WD TN, July 16, 2018), a Tennessee federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was not issued passes to attend religious services when he used his Muslim name rather than his committed name, as well as his complaint about halal meals.In Dorman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:27 am
Quoting the landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:34 am
The Appellate Court in Jones v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
Jones, et al v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Jones (April 17) – Whether the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
Supreme Court Dutton v. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 3:45 pm
To reach this conclusion, the Court contrasts the Miller opinion with the categorical bars in Roper and Graham and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:48 am
The Supreme Court of Alabama addressed a number of bad faith issues in its decision on Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 11:31 am
In Carson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
District Court for the Northern District of California ordered environmental groups and the USDA "to present more evidence at a coming hearing, insuring that a courtroom battle over the legality of some genetically modified beets will continue for at least a few more weeks. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:22 pm
Jones, 239 F.3d at 720. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 10:42 am
In one case, Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
Today the 11th Circuit issued a per curiam decision on Kelvin Leon Jones, et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
See Jones v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Specifically, we are happy to report about a fine example of a federal court applying common sense, in Hale v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 5:56 am
Tom Goldstein is counsel of record, and those who had a substantial part in the drafting of the brief include Brian Love, Melanie Wachtell, and Jameson Jones of the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic and Eric Zagrans of Zagrans Guffey. [read post]
