Search for: "Justice Party (The)"
Results 801 - 820
of 60,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2021, 7:30 am
“How Stephen Breyer Is Helping to Destroy the Norms He Claims to Cherish; The Republican Party will use the justice’s sentimental beliefs about democracy against him”: Michael Tomasky has this essay online at The New Republic. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
DAILY CALLER: Why won’t the Justice Department let Christopher Coates testify on New Black Panther Party case? [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:58 am
Baby Girl, Sotomayor has taken the side of the Native American parties, even if that meant her being one of the only dissenters, if not the sole dissenter. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
Well, Mr Justice Birss, you failed jet-lag sufferers and insomniacs everywhere. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:44 am
Previously, we discussed the controversy surrounding his wife, Virginia, and her involvement in Liberty Central, a conservative political action group that had received large contributions to help it advocate policy positions aligned with the Tea party movement. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
The distributors were not parties. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 3:32 am
Or in the alternative, what if justices of one party send letters to the president of anticipated retirements within the president’s term so that he can prospectively nominate, confirm and commission them as Supreme Court justices contingent on the anticipated vacancy, and then they all decide, “Nah, I’ll stay a justice. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 11:33 am
If either party dies before the matter is resolved, however, the surviving party must move to substitute an appropriate representative. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:35 am
The idea is that once confirmed, justices become desperate to be invited to the right cocktail parties and conform their views to those of the liberal intelligentsia.Whether the Times has influenced Kennedy's views is not something I am qualified to answer. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
Last week, in an opinion by Justice Alito (joined by the unusual line-up of Justices Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, and Breyer), the Court allowed the Catawba Project and Duke Energy - but not the City of Charlotte - to intervene in the case. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:02 am
” Justice Matheson noted that the respondents conceded that &ldq [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:09 am
It’s rare that a party declines an opportunity to present their case to the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:56 am
Regina (TNT Post UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Royal Mail Group Ltd, interested party) Case C-357/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The Royal Mail was exempt from value-added tax as a supplier of public postal services, except for supplies of goods or services whose terms had been individually negotiated. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:50 am
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday voted 13 to 6 and almost along party lines to forward the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the full Senate, clearing a path for her probable confirmation as the Supreme Court’s first Hispanic justice. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 7:04 am
Instead, the critical factor is whether all contested issues have been resolved, allowing the Court to grant justice by entering a judgment nunc pro tunc. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:55 pm
Fox Television Stations, et al. because Justice Alito owned $2,000 worth of Disney stock (ABC, Inc., a subsidary of Walt Disney, Co., is also a party to the action). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 5:44 am
They’re bigger than any one party. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm
But that’s not the empathy that the legal literature contemplates because the “wrong” party prevailed in that case: the party that was suffering, distressed, and which were deserving of pity and to which most commentators were inclined to spare or succour, to use the terms from the OED definition of “compassion”, but not the definition of empathy.To use a related, but more current, example: Obama surely hopes that now with Justices Sotomayor… [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:34 am
She will be a justice, no more or less so than any other justice. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Regina (Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269; [2011] WLR (D) 95 “Where a party sought permission to appeal from a judge and permission was granted on terms, that party had no right to appeal against those terms by reason of section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999, unless the party concerned was not present at the permission hearing at which the terms were imposed. [read post]
