Search for: "LJ"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
Even if all that was wrong, LJ Longmore would still prefer to follow the recent cases, to avoid a ‘divided voice’ in the Court of Appeal(!) [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
” [para 34] Cranston LJ agreed. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
As Longmore LJ put it in a short concurring judgment, at [56], “it is not for the decision letter to ‘demonstrate’ anything; it is for the applicant to demonstrate an error of law, not the other way round”. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm
Ward LJ gave the leading judgment. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:34 am
There is nothing in this judgment that is significantly invasive of Mr Donald’s private or family life (Maurice Kay LJ, paragraph 54). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
Sanction should be for the failure to provide valid information Longmore LJ and Sir Robin Jacob argued that the whole point of restricting shares is to sanction those who fail to provide the information requested. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
Elias LJ, giving the only reasoned judgment of the court, found it was not necessary for this argument to be resolved for the purposes of these appeals (which were dismissed), so “a determination of this important question will have to await another day”. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
In an extended and interestingly purposive reading of the statute, LJ Toulson accepts Auld’s view. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Permission was refused on the papers by Rimer LJ and an oral application was refused by Lloyd LJ. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
Arnold LJ and Birss LJ agreed with IDC that the first instance judgment suffered from an internal inconsistency: it identified a non-FRAND element in the comparable licences due to the reduction in value attributable to past sales, but failed to account for this in using the LG licence to derive a FRAND rate for Lenovo. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:14 am
A couple of notable quotes from the judgment: Davis LJ (para 39): The law of unintended consequences is no part of the law of England and Wales. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:16 am
Sullivan LJ (an experienced planning judge) disagreed. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
Jackson LJ's attack on "grotesque" funding arrangements (see link) raises an issue I have been meaning to comment on for some time. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:16 am
In considering the application, the judge cited Rix LJ in Konkola v Coromin who said that although a stay based on case management is possible it requires "rare and compelling" circumstances. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:42 am
Additional Resources: Lawrence family seeks help on project for man afflicted with asbestosis, July 14, 2016, By Mackenzie Clark, LJ World.com More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:30 am
Further, even where (rarely) I have not succeeded on my own Part 47.19 offer, I have often been able to persuade a judge to make a costs order in the paying party's favour or no order for costs where the bill has been significantly reduced.As readers are no doubt aware, Jackson LJ has now been given the task of undertaking a fundamental review of litigation funding. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm
However, this reference to payment as highlighted by Longmore LJ would seem to require a transfer of monies at each stage. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
She had correctly noted that in that case Butler-Sloss LJ had made it clear that personal injury damages were not sacrosanct and could therefore be considered by the court when deciding an ancillary relief application. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:20 am
Clarence House was rather unhappy about this, as Ward LJ put it: Who was this unforthcoming Gibraltarian company who had been foist upon it without its knowledge or consent in place of its approved tenant, a copper-bottomed high street bank? [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:01 am
The IPKat heartily agrees both with the decision and with the observation of Jacob LJ that the fact that 3G technology standards are global does not preclude a single national court from exercising jurisdiction in respect of the matter before it. [read post]
