Search for: "LONG v. ANDERSON"
Results 801 - 820
of 984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 11:37 am
In an interview with Tim Anderson at Dev Class, Jeremy Soller, the principal engineer at System 76, said that it is “Illegal source code laundering, automated by GitHub. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Also, a soft circuit-split: the Sixth Circuit breaks with the Eleventh in electing to spell Anderson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:30 pm
And technology has come a long way in terms of reducing and overcoming barriers posed by many types of disabilities. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 4, 2019 Tags: Arbitrage, Boards of Directors, Deal protection, Engagement, Mergers & acquisitions, REITs, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value Fiduciary Blind Spot: The Failure of Institutional Investors to Prevent the Illegitimate Use of Working Americans’ Savings for Corporate Political Spending Posted by Tami Groswald Ozery, HLS… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Vance, STATE LAW PREFERENCE ACTIONS: STILL ALIVE AFTER SHERWOOD PARTNERS V. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
Lehmann describes the dubious reasoning behind the court’s 1886 fiat, in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm
In today’s case (Nicholls v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
Admittedly, it’s a problematic but repairable system, for example, via improved judicial disqualification and recusal rules post-Caperton v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:03 am
Morgan Stanley (2005WL 679071) case and the missteps of the Zubulake v UBS Warburg [220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)} case, I am satisfied we have moved well beyond the Micron vs. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:48 am
” McLauchlan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
Tumblr: NYT v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am
Stephen Bannon has defied the Jan. 6 Committee’s subpoena for documents and testimony. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1873, in Bradwell v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Prepared by Nicholas Anderson, summer intern at Woods, LaFortune LLP (2nd year student in University of Ottawa Law School/ Carleton University joint JD/MA program). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
We note that in the Trump v. [read post]