Search for: "Lloyd v. Lloyd" Results 801 - 820 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2013, 11:31 pm
The tide has somewhat turned as a result of Nationwide v Davisons [2012], where the court made it clear that relief available under section 61 is a reality .It is important to note that the Court of Appeal decision in the Davisons case does does not establish new breach of trust principles, the Court of Appeal decision reinforces the decision in Lloyds Bank v Markandan & Uddin [2012] that a solicitor will have committed a breach of trust in parting with loan money… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This failure by plaintiff to adequately allege negligence on the part of defendant attorneys requires dismissal of this legal malpractice action (see Lloyd’s Syndicate 2987 v Furman Kornfeld & Brennan, LLP, 182 AD3d 487, 488 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:51 am
Before getting to the Supreme Court the subject matter of the case has been subject to at least five decisions (two of which will be subject to the scrutiny of the Supreme Court):Dispute about the jurisdiction of DNIsNovember 2012:  Mr Justice Arnold said he had jurisdiction to hear DNIs with respect of the foreign designations of the Lilly patent (see decision here and AdvoKat summary here)May 2013:  A Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin, Lloyd and Longmore upheld… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Lloyd also talks of the need to redact from the jury's view any charges that were entered nolle prosequi, and cites Byrd v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Lloyd also talks of the need to redact from the jury's view any charges that were entered nolle prosequi, and cites Byrd v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 6:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The opinion is styled, Certain Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London, Syndicate Numbers 2020, 1084, 2001, 457, 510, 2791, 2987, 3000, 1221, 5000 And Navigators Insurance Company UK v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 1:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is exactly what happened in a 2005 Northern District case, the opinion is styled, Allstate Texas Lloyd’s v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:29 pm
Even Justice Frank Iacobucci had a gavel at the SCC and the BCSC talks about gavel-to-gavel coverage in R. v. [read post]