Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 801 - 820
of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
I refer to this Court’s judgment in I v Finland, on 17 July 2008 at paragraphs 47-48, concerning the disclosure of the Applicant’s HIV status from a medical records database that was not adequately secure. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
4) Judicial activism v. judicial restraint. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC noted it could. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
The existence of last week's ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Jacob LJ and Richards LJ) in Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited v Eli Lilly and Company Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 has already been noted on this weblog, but not much has been said about its substance. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:34 am
The proposed bench for the hand down consists of Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Mance. https://www.supremecourt.uk/news/future-judgments.html [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
Lord Mance agreed. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
A Time Lord. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The Judgment In delivering the leading judgment (and re-instating the struck out defence of fair comment in the case) Lord Phillips conducted a full review of the authorities and concluded by endorsing Lord Nicholls’ summary of the elements of the defence in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng with one exception. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:10 am
Law The House of Lord decisions in: Clarke v Edinburgh & District Tramways Co Ltd 1919 SC HL 35 and Thomas v Thomas 1947 SC (HL) 45 establish that a trial judge is in a superior position, having seen and heard the witnesses, to form a conclusion as to the credibility and reliability of those witnesses. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:20 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kempster, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 975 (07 May 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Seele Austria GmbH & Co KG v Tokio Marine Europe Insurance Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 441 (07 May 2008) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Lord Alton of Liverpool & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 443 (07 May 2008) Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446 (07 May 2008) Arnup v MW White Ltd. [2008] EWCA Civ 447 (07… [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The difficultly inherent in the case was reflected by the disagreement between the two patent specialist judges who heard the case, Lord Justices Arnold and Floyd. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
In early May, a Florida federal district court approved a consent decree in Doe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
Inevitably, I have to ask him what working with Lord Goldsmith was like. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
And since public companies are unlikely to have benefited from the limited injunction in National Small Business United v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 10:23 am
Dance & Battersbee v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 8:28 am
In Church of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:18 am
These are added on a regular basis, with the most recent currently being that of Coventry & Others (Respondents) v Lawrence & Another [2014] UKSC 46, delivered on July 23rd. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 11:57 pm
Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider (1925) AG Canada v AG Alberta (the insurance reference) (1916) Montreal v Montreal Street Railway (1912) Download Standard Podcast [read post]
