Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 801 - 820
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
It came as ’something of a surprise’ that the case had reached the Lords in the light of R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:28 pm
I'm thinking of something around four years. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:31 pm
That view would, I think, be wrong, since we all now know that s.85(4) as unamended did not require strict compliance (see Knowsley HT v White and other appeals [2008] UHKL 70) nor does it even have to be “substantial compliance” (per Lord Mance, in the minority in Knowsley) but the extent to which compliance is necessary is a matter for the judge in each case (per Lord Neuberger, Knowsley, [107]). [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
A v Croydon and M v Lambeth, a related case, had previous had a hearing on the issue of whether the absence of any right to appeal or make representations on the LA’s assessment of age was a breach of Art 6. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
I'm not sure [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
., with introductory note by Bruce Zagaris House of Lords: EM (Lebanon) v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:40 am
This petition isn't about any individual case and isn't about any case I'm involved in. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
Speakers included prominent members of the judiciary, such as Lord Hoffmann and Lord Justice Jacob from the UK and the Hon. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
The Judge denied both of her requests.That same day, despite the above facts, Judd Bagley (pictured right) took the opportunity to use my continuing divorce proceedings to deliberately post innuendos, smears, and lies about me on the Yahoo Overstock.com chat board using anonymous alias "sweetpotatobullmacho" that he has acknowledged is his.Referring to my former spouse's April 8, 2009 request for an order of protection and restraining order, that evening Bagley wrote (Copy… [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
Then, for areas like personal injury, count the number of television commercials on daytime TV from the "national" feeder/referral PI firms like Jacoby and Meyers et al.See what I'm getting at? [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:06 am
McE v Prison Service of Northern Ireland and Another; C and A v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland; M v Same House of Lords “Covert surveillance of communications between lawyers and their clients, covered by legal professional privilege, was permitted under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, notwithstanding any statutory rights of [...] [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:09 am
In re McE (Appellant) (Northern Ireland); In re M (Appellant) (Northern Ireland); In re C (AP) and another (AP) (Appellants) (Northern Ireland) [2009] UKHL 15 (11 March 2009) Ofulue and another (FC) (Appellant) v Bossert (FC) (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 16 (11 March 2009) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
TITLE Lords of finance : the bankers who broke the world / Liaquat Ahamed. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:55 am
I’d be interested in other’s views here, as the discussion of the House of Lords judgment in White v Knowsley strikes me as slightly odd. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Fink, I'm a blogger and I'm wondering what you think about the revolution occurring right under your nose? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:20 am
Tornillo and NAACP v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
Finally, I’m not entirely convinced that this decision is compatible with Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin), discussed by us here. [read post]
