Search for: "MARRIAGE OF A R C" Results 801 - 820 of 1,562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
”The decision notes Hudson had not been practising recently as she was on sick leave resulting from a marriage breakdown and other personal issues “her counsel termed ‘a complete derailment’ of her personal life. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:13 am
People have chosen to assume that all the rest must be true, not knowing the truth itself, merely because his current marriage had a strange, highly uncommon genesis. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:04 am by Cathy Moran, Esq.
Even in the face of a state court denial of spousal support in a short term marriage, the 9th Circuit BAP found that the award to the non debtor spouse of  $185,000 in attorneys fees incurred in a custody battle to be in the nature of support. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:08 am by Giles Peaker
Sections 4(5) to 4(7) provide that: (5) A person shall be deemed to fulfil the requirements of sub-paragraphs (1)(a) [the one that leads to exemption] and (3), where– (a) he occupies the dwelling which he occupied on the relevant date; (b) this paragraph applied to the previous beneficiary on the relevant date; and (c) the requirements of sub-paragraphs (6) and (7) are satisfied in his case. (6) The requirements of this sub-paragraph are that the person was, on the relevant… [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:08 am by Giles Peaker
Sections 4(5) to 4(7) provide that: (5) A person shall be deemed to fulfil the requirements of sub-paragraphs (1)(a) [the one that leads to exemption] and (3), where– (a) he occupies the dwelling which he occupied on the relevant date; (b) this paragraph applied to the previous beneficiary on the relevant date; and (c) the requirements of sub-paragraphs (6) and (7) are satisfied in his case. (6) The requirements of this sub-paragraph are that the person was, on the relevant… [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
§ 25-101(C) further provides that “Marriage between persons of the same sex is void and prohibited. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:24 am by Guest & Gray
In contrast, Texas Family Code Section 160.204 defines a presumed father as follows: (a) A man is presumed to be the father of a child if: (1) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born during the marriage; (2) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born before the 301st day after the date the marriage is terminated by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity, or divorce; (3) he married the mother of the child before the… [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
Based on the attorney’s answers, if X+A are married, and they cohabit with B then C then D, there will be no prosecution. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Neil Cahn
Before their marriage, they resided in the same Upper Manhattan apartment that they continued to occupy after the marriage. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages; and R (Edwards & Anor) v Environment Agency & Ors. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:45 pm by Shahram Miri
Although if Carl is connected to Daniel through blood, marriage or other means per Prob C § 21351(a), the transfer is permissible. [read post]