Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 801 - 820 of 5,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, the Thibodeauxes cannot show as a matter of law that Section 230(c)(1) would bar GCC’s participatory-liability claims. * Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(d)(5), which allows release on a “case-by-case” basis for “compelling” reasons in the public interest. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm by Alden Abbott
The FTC’s mission is to protect consumers and promote competition (see generally here). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
Two examples within the last year, both striking down agency actions, stand out: In Alabama Ass’n of Realtors v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1, 16 n.5 (2012).[9]     Moreover, arguably Bivens liability could be imposed on an agency officials for authorizing agency personnel to violate “clearly established” Fourth Amendment constraints. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Jeffrey N. Gordon
Last February, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed to “modernize” the reporting of beneficial ownership of a company’s stock under section 13(d) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
The coup d’état in Chile, which took place a shortly after Allende’s speech is one case in point and marks the beginning of what quickly became neoliberal hegemony in Chile. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:34 am by Howard Friedman
In discussing whether the school district could regulate Coach Kennedy's speech because Kennedy was a government employee, Justice Gorsuch said in part:[W]hat matters is whether Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Dans le cadre de cette interprétation, la Cour s’est référée, essentiellement, à l’objectif de prévisibilité et de sécurité juridique de la convention de Bruxelles ou du règlement nº 44/2001. 67. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:18 am by jonathanturley
Thus, I agree that “[n]othing in [the Court’s] opinion should be under- stood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Other place we focus on Ds use is dilution, which seems to imply that the D must be using the matter as “a mark or trade name. [read post]