Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 801 - 820
of 13,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
NLRB, 563 F.3d 492 (D.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Meow Media, Inc., 300 F.3d 683, 696-97 (6th Cir. 2002). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am
For those claims the entire question of what the FHA can or should allow don’t matter. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 2:52 am
-made F-16 fighter jets as soon as this summer, the Dutch defense minister has said. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Michener, and T. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Guest Post by Samuel F. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm
Home Corp., 759 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1985). [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:11 am
" … [T]he lawsuit [does not] involve[] disclosure of "information of the utmost intimacy" …. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
”[4] The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation of the FCA, emphasizing that “[w]hat matters for an FCA case is whether the defendant knew the claim was false,” because “[t]he FCA’s scienter element refers to respondents’ knowledge and subjective beliefs—not to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
(The LEWP, composed of representatives from EU member states, assists with EU regulatory and policy matters involving crime and customs issues.) [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:02 am
The stalking statute provides that "[t]his section does not apply to constitutionally protected activity. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I’m pro-democracy, and I don’t want to be on the wrong side of history,” is inspiring, to be sure, but to expect it is beyond naïve. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm
Gov't Resp. 15. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Neither Westlaw nor Lexis has the case, and the case found at 925 F.3d 1339 is A.D. v Azar, 925 F.3d 1291 (D.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
Madigan , 702 F.3d 933, 935 (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
Kang Haggerty members Edward T. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Even if the plaintiffs in Lee don’t seek cert, perhaps because they fear the Supreme Court precedent that might result, we now have a consequential circuit split on the meaning of Borak. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
Why does the new law matter? [read post]
