Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 4,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:52 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
For example, are churches entitled to a “ministerial exception” exempting them from federal anti-discrimination laws when hiring and firing ministers? [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm by vforberger
Note: This separation between church and state is extended to ministers and rabbis and other church leaders who are themselves exempt from Social Security taxes. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 15th February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Coughlan) v Minister for the Cabinet Office. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am by Anita Davies, Matrix
As Lord Bingham put it in R (Gentle) v Prime Minister [2008] 1 AC 1356 at [8] there are: “issues which judicial tribunals have traditionally been very reluctant to entertain because they recognise their limitations as suitable bodies to resolve them. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Comcast v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Malaysia The Prime Minister Najib Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor have initiated a libel suit against an opposition MP, Nga Kor Ming for alleging that that the prime minister’s wife attended Cabinet meetings. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
From May 2006 until July 2019, he served as Minister of Natural Resources and from July 2019 to early 2022 as Assistant Prime Minister for Energy Affairs [6]. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:10 am by Shaiba Rather
In March 2020, the NDMA issued an order directing the central and state governments to take measures “ensuring social distancing,” and it was soon after this order that the prime minister imposed the national lockdown under Section 10(2)(l) of the DMA. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In Courtroom 2 from Monday 9 July 2012 over two days is the appeal from the Court of Session of Walton v The Scottish Ministers. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:07 pm by Jeff Foust
“In other words, Defendant asks the Court to permit the Government to continue to provide funds to Defendant-Intervenor even if Defendant cannot certify that those funds will flow to NPO Energomash and/or other entities that may be under the control of Deputy Prime Minister Rogozin,” the document states. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:01 am by Michael Geist
Enough of CRTC Chair Ian Scott dismissing consumer concerns about the state of communications services. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
Writing for the 7th Circuit in his usual engaging style, yesterday Judge Richard Posner in Digrugilliers v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:52 pm
The current bills attempt to follow Scotland's lead.Mr Michael Wills (the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice) explained during the House of Commons debate that the Government was still assessing what its "response should be on pleural plaques and the wider issues affecting those suffering from asbestos-related diseases. [read post]