Search for: "Makely v. United States Air Force"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm
Petitioner Thomas Buffington, an Air Force veteran, argues that before deferring to the agency, the court should have first exhausted all traditional tools of statutory construction, including the canon that ambiguities should be resolved in favor of veterans (the so-called pro-veteran canon). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:45 pm
Paper making machines: movable asset While considering the leviability of excise duty on paper-making machines in Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
So in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 2:53 pm
DoD determined that the barriers would serve as force multipliers," by allowing military personnel to cover other high-traffic border areas without existing barriers, a benefit plainly intended to assist DHS, which, by statute, is tasked with "[s]ecuring the borders, territorial waters, ports, terminals, waterways, and air, land, and sea transportation systems of the United States…. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:34 pm
In Scott v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Here is how, legally, the United States and allied governments might implement the approach I advocated with Johnson. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 06-2020). [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
AAPC, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
At this point, there is the initial AQ7 ad, then a group response letter drafted by Ben Wittes of the Brookings Institution and my co-task force member at the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law, which I also signed. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:40 am
In 1979, in Nevada v. [read post]
