Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 801 - 820 of 5,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 3:39 am by Daniel Schwartz
2011 was actually the high water mark of claims filed at the EEOC with a total number of claims at just shy of 100,000 (99,947 to be exact). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:52 pm
Today Advocate General Mazak gave his Opinion in Case C? [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 3:13 am
Applicants may present secondary source evidence to show that a proposed mark used on goods in a decorative or ornamental manner also has a source-indicating function by showing that the applicant has used the proposed mark in a non-ornamental manner with goods or services in the past other than those being refused as ornamentalAnd so the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: Suppose applicant had… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:41 am
Sia"Baltmark Invest", Cancellation No. 92066594 (January 10, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:03 am
Bammann maintained that "ROMA" is a weak mark entitled to only a narrow scope of protection, and further that the involved goods and services travel in different channels of trade. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:51 am
 In re Cali Banh Mi Inc., Serial No. 90000386 (July 29, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cynthia C. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 2:31 am by John L. Welch
Well, I guess it was a good exercise for the Vanderbilt Legal Clinic.Post your comment here: Text Copyright John L. [read post]
The limitations of the trade mark right under Article 14(1)(c) EUTM Regulation (referential use) do not apply to such use. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
With similar reasoning, the BoA rejected e.g. the word mark ‘Team Business IT’ for IT-related goods and services because the mark will be understand as a reference to goods and services from the business IT sector for which a team is responsible (R 2087/2020-2 at para. 21). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:06 am
The second notification relates to two apparently related trade mark cases from Germany: CJEU cases: C-217/13 & C-218/13: OBERBANK AND OTHERS (trade marks)   We have received notification of two joined cases referred to the Court of Justice:  C-217/13 and C-218/13 [by the Bundespatentgericht]. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
In re Stevland Morris d/b/a Stevie Wonder, Serial No. 88388322 (February 16, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:27 am
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 3:07 am
A TTAB judge once told me that you can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by just looking at the goods/services and the marks. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by John L. Welch
[By the way, I've heard a TTAB Judge say that most 2(d) cases can be decided just by looking at the involved goods/services and the marks.] [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 5:03 am by Eleonora Rosati
It concluded that, so far as the goods and services which were relevant to the infringement by SkyKick were concerned, the allegation of bad faith against Sky essentially amounted to an allegation that when it applied for goods such as “software”, it intended to use its marks for a type of software, but not all types of software. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:01 pm
Is Article 12(1) of Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks to be interpreted as meaning that there are proper reasons for non-use of a mark if the implementation of the corporate strategy being pursued by the trade mark proprietor is delayed for reasons outside the control of the undertaking, or is the trade mark proprietor obliged to change his corporate strategy in order to be able to… [read post]