Search for: "Mark Williams v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Mark Foster (`Individual A’ in Count Two) and Michael Lipson (`Individual B’ in Count Three) by including their names in the Fellowship resolution which falsely stated they were present at a meeting of all Fellowship members in which they voted to allow Miller, as Fellowship's managing member, to pledge Fellowship property for the DEMCO loan. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am by Rachel Brown, Preston Lim
The release of the XuanTie 910 thus marks a key step in that drive towards technological self-sufficiency. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
The Carmel decision marked the first time the state's highest court has ruled on current annexation law. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary relating to last week’s decision in Williams v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 pm
Byrne sued for malpractice in Kentucky state court. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams debunks “recent indistinct and misleading news reports” suggesting that “the Supreme Court of the United States has … asked the State of Mississippi or Governor to defend the battle emblem on the Mississippi flag. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(Illinois approved the measure on June 10, 2019, and for technical reasons then re-approved it a week later, but June 10 marks Illinois’ official adoption and serves to distinguish Illinois as the first state to sign on.) [read post]