Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 801 - 811
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2006, 11:46 am
Jack Balkin, here; David Luban, here; Sandy Levinson, here; Marty Lederman, here. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 1:45 pm
" Marty Lederman has this post today at the "Balkinization" blog. [read post]
Useful blogosphere analysis of yesterday's Bush administration war on terrorism proposed legislation
7 Sep 2006, 4:17 pm
Marty Lederman also comments as well - but the place to go for Marty's analysis of the proposed legislation and the new army manual is over at Balkinization, here, here, and here, and I'm sure more to follow. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:33 am
We'll start with Marty Lederman's comments - although we sometimes (often?) [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:29 am
., Stephen Bainbridge at [www.professorbainbridge.com], Orin Kerr at [volokh.com], Marty Lederman at [balkin.blogspot.com], and Eugene Volokh at [volokh.com]. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:22 am
Update: At "SCOTUSblog," Marty Lederman has a post titled "SG Briefs in K-12 Race-Conscious Admissions Cases" linking to those briefs. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 6:49 pm
Moreover, the criminal justice system is designed for dealing with ordinary crimes, not today's global terrorism, as is shown by the rules, for example, that entitle a person who is arrested to a prompt probable-cause hearing before a judge and require that criminal trials be open to the public....Marty Lederman responds at Balkinization, here. [read post]
28 Nov 2005, 4:10 pm
Let me respond quickly to Marty Lederman's comment to my post re David Luban's WP article below - my numbers track his:1. [read post]
28 Nov 2005, 9:26 am
Marty Lederman was kind enough to post a thoughtful comment, including questions for me, re a couple of posts of mine addressing the standard of detainee treatment and the issue of the application of the standard of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. [read post]
7 Dec 2004, 7:25 am
According to this post by Marty Lederman at SCOTUS Blog, the Court issued one opinion today and it was not Booker/Fanfan. [read post]
1 Dec 2004, 6:02 am
In one, Marty Lederman suggests here that a footnote the petitioners' brief in the consolidated cases of Whitfield v. [read post]
