Search for: "Matter of C. F. v C. M."
Results 801 - 820
of 1,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Para Peter M. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part II surveys the provisions of the draft AUMF that have generated the most controversy and debate, including: (a) its lack of a stated purpose; (b) the prohibition on “enduring offensive ground combat operations”; (c) its definition of “associated forces”; (d) its transparency and oversight provision; (e) its relationship to the Law of Armed Conflict; (f) its sunset clause; and (g) one final matter that has flown under the radar up to this point… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
As the Supreme Court recently recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
Michael Reif and Carl F. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
I’m not trying to improve outcomes, I’m trying to improve defenses. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
By Amanda M. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
” Grants For late February ALLEN MARK DACUS, ELIZABETH C. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
” Grants For late February ALLEN MARK DACUS, ELIZABETH C. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
Logan, 355 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:32 am
The Marchuk v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
, 482 F.3d 135 (2nd Cir. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
The first judgment : A Local Authority v B, F & G [2014] EWCOP B18 (21 March 2014) HHJ Cardinal in Court of Protection. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Stroup v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
C 13-01465 SI, 2014 WL 722592 (N.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Defendant may use demonstrative and documentary evidence, which the State may inspect and copy or photograph after paying reasonable expenses therefor: a) photographs c) video e) maps g) pharmacy records h) films d) diagrams f) medical/hospital h) weather records10. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Google, Inc., 766 F. 3d 929 (9th.Cir. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:32 am
Ed Donnelly Enters., Inc., 575 F.3d 567, 575 (6th Cir.2009); McCauley v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
To skip most of the judgment, this concerned a child, P, and his parents, F & M. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
