Search for: "Matter of Henderson" Results 801 - 820 of 1,080
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm by Steve Vladeck
Circuit panel (Henderson, Williams, Randolph) to vacate and remand the grant of habeas relief in Hatim v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by Colin O'Keefe
This week's group offers a strong blend of blogs from firms large and small, with each publication touching on a different subject matter. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:56 pm by Howard Knopf
It would have been very interesting and informative had this matter gone to trial, but we will presumably never know why it did not. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:14 am by Peter Vodola
  The court also indicated that it did not matter whether the settlement in that case was a structured settlement - even if it was, the SSPA did not apply based on that provision of the Kansas law. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
Hopefully this matter will be resolved for the next edition in six months time. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 10:04 pm by Peter Tillers
Question: Did anyone ever think that lawyers (or, for that matter, law teachers, law school deans, and university presidents) are as a group paragons of virtue? [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:58 am by emagraken
  The portions of the reports describing the authors’ own opinions on the matters in issue were not admitted [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:50 am by Larry Bodine
“In-house counsel are no longer as comfortable with law firms raising their rates or staffing matters with a cast of thousands. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:42 am by INFORRM
Date Case Name Reference Court Subject Matter Posts Final win -  C or D 15.12.10 Shergill v Purewal Sir Charles Gray Libel  Summary Determination D 13.12.10 Smith v ADVFN [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) Tugendhat J Libel  Summary Determination D 3.12.10 Lait v Evening Standard (No.2) [2010] EWHC 3239 (QB) Eady J Libel  Fair Comment Summary Determination D 24.11.10 Daniels v BBC [2010] EWHC 3057 (QB) Sharp J Libel  Strike Out 5RB D 8.11.10 Ifheda v Archnat… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:10 am by Michael O'Hear
 Henderson and Maclin moved to dismiss the charges, claiming that Wisconsin’s disenfranchisement law violates the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:58 am by Mike
Hayward Unified School District is an employment grievance plead as a civil rights matter. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:11 am by Josh Wright
Todd Henderson is a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am by Larry Bodine
Other behaviors perceived as arrogant include: Having little experience on the other side of a matter Excluding general counsel in client communications Not including junior members of a company's in-house legal team. [read post]