Search for: "Matter of Jones" Results 801 - 820 of 5,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 10:22 am by Stacie Rosenzweig
The Jones team tried to move for a mistrial today, which led some to speculate they actually dumped the data on purpose, which seems just as conspiratorial as some of Jones’ theories for which he was sued, but no matter. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:17 pm by Mitu Gulati
  Savings plans do indeed seem to make a difference; but a bunch of other factors also appear to matter - some of them quite surprising. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by patrickdaniellaw
The Importance of the Jones Act One of the most important components of maritime law in the United States is the Jones Act (or the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, to use the complete official name). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:29 am
Trade secrets claims are generally matters covered by state, not federal, law. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:40 pm by Site Administrator
By Megan Jones From inauguration day to current outings in DC and around the nation, the limo in which President Obama rides is, by all speculation, the one of the safest vehicles ever made. [read post]
21 May 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It is always an interesting question whether or not two matters will be found to be sufficiently related to be deemed a single claim. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:44 am
Jones, J.S.C., Ocean County’s prolific family court judge, the Court barred a litigant from appearing and testifying in a divorce matter through a designated power of attorney. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
Unfortunately, the judge’s bias and prejudgment are a matter of public record. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:25 am
The following recap is by Jameson Jones of the Stanford Supreme Court Clinic. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 3:37 am by SHG
It’s just a matter of surrounding the conduct with words to create the specter of some connection to crime. [read post]