Search for: "Matter of Jones" Results 801 - 820 of 6,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
' chant as the host of the Infowars show on which the video was streamed stated, 'Alex Jones at this moment is leading the march toward the Capitol building.'" "In the same video, [Shroyer] can be heard telling the crowd, 'today we march for the Capitol because on this historic January 6, 2021, we have to let our Congressmen and women know, and we have to let Mike Pence know, they stole the election, we know they stole it, and we aren't going to accept it! [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm by Sean J. O'Bryan
State courts hearing out federal cases (as determined by the presence of maritime law) must apply federal law to any substantive matters, including those protected by the Jones Act. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm by Noam Biale
In other words, it does not matter if the prisoner is actually innocent, as the lower courts found in the case of Barry Lee Jones. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
Jones -- but they had only two votes for such a reversal, so Waccamaw stood as the applicable law.In conclusion on this line of argument, I did not perceive a single member of the current panel who was ready to adopt ECUSA's reading of Chief Justice Beatty's 2017 opinion and simply hand over the properties to the national church -- including Chief Justice Beatty himself. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
None of our precedents involved a defendant who was improperly joined as a matter of procedure, as is the case here. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am by Leesfield Scolaro
  As a general legal matter, Jones Act claims cannot be removed to federal court. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to contribute to the development of an integrated and progressive jurisprudence and understanding on freedom of expression and information around the world. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 7:53 am by zola.support.team
The appeal itself must comply with certain requirements, including a statement of the OHA’s basis for jurisdiction over the matter. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Or if President Bush picked Edith Jones over David Souter. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
If you learn your colleague Mary Jones has accused your mutual employer of sexual harassment, you may not want to be legally bound to indefinitely keep that secret fact segregated from all the other things you know about Jones, and all the other things you might say about her to coworkers or friends. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
MLDI Legal Director (at that time) Nani Jansen Reventlow’s arguments, delivered with John Jones QC and Steven Finizio, persuaded the Court to deliver a groundbreaking judgment holding that the imprisonment of a journalist for defamation, and the use of criminal law against journalists generally violate the right to freedom of expression. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 7:57 am by Brian Liu, Raquel Leslie
The Chinese Embassy in Washington so far has not responded to the China Telecom ban, and a Foreign Ministry spokesperson appeared to bat away a question on the matter at a press conference. [read post]