Search for: "Matter of Steven C." Results 801 - 820 of 1,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the American Federation of Scientists, told the Los Angeles Times the following concerning Obama: “[c]learly, he took a critical stance toward surveillance as a senator. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm
This is a Class C felony, punishable also by between 2 and 20 years. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:04 pm by Steven Eversole
A violation of this statute is a Class C felony, punishable by between 2 and 20 years in prison.Contact Birmingham Criminal Defense Attorney Steven Eversole at (866) 831-5292. [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Contact Birmingham Criminal Defense Attorney Steven Eversole at (866) 831-5292. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  The Lancaster opinion—authored by President Clinton’s appointee, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg—is striking in its matter-of-fact acceptance that AEDPA bars relief even for someone who may very we [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:17 am by Allison Trzop
In its former incarnation as Thomas C. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
First, as Justice Breyer argued in his separate opinion, the presumption of extraterritoriality arises because most statutes take domestic matters as their basic focus. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
  Steven Schwinn reports on the Kebodeaux oral argument for this blog, emphasizing the ways in which the Justices seemed to be concerned about limits on congressional authority. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The defendent, Rachel Myers, withdrew her allegations unreservedly and apologised to Lady Colthurst “for the distress and embarrassment which this matter caused [the Claimant]. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Two recent Supreme Court rulings that were handed down barely one month apart address the same, important topic: Under what circumstances may federal district courts insist on proof of matters that go to the merits of the case as a precondition for allowing the plaintiffs to proceed via a class action, rather than through a series of individual lawsuits? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Likewise, in the recent Michigan case, the Sixth Circuit said that even though the state of Michigan had no obligation to employ race-based affirmative action, by removing the matter from the ordinary political process, Proposal 2 had violated the Hunter/Seattle principle. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Greenburgh, the mail: placing unmailable matter can be banned too. [read post]