Search for: "Matter of T." Results 801 - 820 of 161,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 1:25 pm by Commentary:
To be honest, even though I’m the food and beverage director at Merritt Clubs, I hadn’t given it a ton of thought either. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 8:59 pm by Gerry Elman
Supreme Court hasn’t yet issued its anxiously-awaited decision in the Bilski2 case. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Guardianship — Less restrictive intervention The Circuit Court for Howard County granted Appellee, the Clifton T. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:20 am by Josh Blackman
The bad news is that, although Congress can fix what ails us in cases like this, it shouldn't have to. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:02 am
She says "By 2039, the Supreme Court basically doesn’t matter anymore," but I guess it all depends on what "doesn't matter" means. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 1:30 pm by Jane Chong
“The law’s totally on my side, meaning, the president can’t have a conflict of interest,” Trump told reporters. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Reference was also made to decisions T 793/93 and T 204/00 as cited in the Case Law, 6th edition, 2010, page 560.The board, however, cannot agree with the above arguments. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by David Pabian
The post Whose Intent Matters in an Abandonment Claim? [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:10 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Christian Bojorquez pointed out that she didn’t suffer any physical harm during the incident. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:20 am by Eugene Volokh
But that wouldn't matter from a First Amendment perspective, it seems to me, since the government is free to express that ideology as it is to express other contested ideologies. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jeroen Willekens
Moreover, the withdrawal of the request misled the general public into believing that the Appellant no longer intended to pursue its subject-matter. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
I don’t want to stir up any controversy here. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Further, according to T 273/10, those features of the embodiment which did not contribute to solving the problem underlying the invention did not have to be part of the claimed subject-matter resulting from the amendment.[3.4.3] In the case at issue, as explained in point [3.3] above the aim of the invention – namely increasing the selectivity to TCS – is merely achieved by addition of selected amounts of chromium to silicon and thus this feature is not “closely… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 9:30 am by Jonathan Rauch
We know that the president fired an FBI director partly for pursuing the matter. [read post]