Search for: "Meyers v. Meyers" Results 801 - 820 of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff showed, prima facie, that at the time of the filing of that petition the defendant knew or should have known of the existence of those causes of action, and the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to that prima facie showing (see Wright v Meyers & Spencer, LLP, 46 AD3d 805; Hansen v Madani, 263 AD2d 881, 883; see also Whelan v Longo, 23 AD3d at 460). [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on Rhines’ cert petition comes from Adam Romero and Ilan Meyer at Jurist. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:19 am by Wystan Ackerman
  The plaintiff bears the initial burden of proof, but the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Meyer v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Zoe Tillman
Senior Judge Inez Reid said she agreed that the statements were “clearly unfair,” but pressed Meyers to explain why it was prejudicial. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
Please contact any member of the Meyers Nave Redevelopment, Real Estate and Housing Practice Group for further information on any of these matters or for assistance in accessing funds and structuring programs to complement first-time homebuyer and redevelopment programs. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]