Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 801 - 820 of 1,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Can/should companies follow employee’s on social media? Gary Vaynerchuk weighs in
19 Jan 2016, 11:24 am by Anthony Zaller
  For example, in Rulon-Miller v. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
Second District Holds CEQA Does Not Apply to San Luis Obispo County’s Issuance of Well Construction Permits Under Its Ministerial Governing Ordinance
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Petitions of the week
25 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
Miller v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
A Breakdown of this Week’s Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Town of Greece v. Galloway Case Involving Prayer at Town Board Meetings
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Case Update
21 Nov 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  In State v. [read post]
The Briefcase - http://briefcase8.com
A Noteworthy Omission in the Texas Border Litigation
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm by Ryan Scoville
Miller. [read post]
Faculty Blog - https://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/
Fourth District Affirms Judgment Rejecting Numerous CEQA Challenges to EIR and Approval Process for Large Master-Planned Riverside County Development Project
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds LA’s Water Allocations To Agricultural Lessees Were Authorized Under Existing Leases And Did Not Constitute Or Implement A Separate “Project” Subject to CEQA Review
2 Aug 2022, 5:41 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
The First District Court of Appeal filed on June 30, and later ordered published on July 26, 2022, its opinion in County of Mono v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Symposium: A defense of the doctrine
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by David LaBahn
California and United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
“Permanent Vacation” In Palm Springs? – Fourth District Holds CEQA’s Short 35-Day Statute of Limitations Does Not Apply Despite City’s Filing of NOE Due To Subsequent Material Change In Street Vacation Project Which Triggered Maximum 180-Day Limitations Period
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Action Seeking to Avoid LAFCO Annexation and SOI Change Approvals is Dismissed for Failure to Comply with Procedural Requirements for Reverse Validation Actions
12 Feb 2014, 3:13 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA School In Session: First District Reverses Judgment Invalidating EIR for Desalination Plant Project In North Coast Rivers Alliance
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am by Arthur F. Coon
 (North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Precedential No. 23: TTAB Says Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Deponent Must Travel to Corporation's Principal Place of Business
17 Jun 2020, 3:01 am
Flanders v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 19 July 2021
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
BAAQMD Adopts “Fair Share” Based CEQA Thresholds of Significance For Evaluating Climate Change Impacts of Land Use Projects And Plans
2 May 2022, 9:32 am by Arthur F. Coon
BAAQMD states its new climate change thresholds follow an approach endorsed by the Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
How the Biggest Supreme Court Victory for Affirmative Action a Decade Ago Contributed to the Defeat for Affirmative Action Last Month in the Schuette Case
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Back To CEQA Basics: Second District Teaches That CEQA Requires Judicial Deference To Lead Agency’s Chosen Baseline, Failure To Administratively Exhaust “Exact Issue” Results In Forfeiture, And An EIR Is Not Faulty For Omitting Immaterial Information
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  CBE’s argument that the federal regulatory purpose differs from California’s failed “because the federal and state goals are identical:  to protect public health and welfare. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Virtual Lecture and Panel
6 Dec 2021, 2:00 am by mes286
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
Legal Scholarship Blog - http://legalscholarshipblog.com
Slam Dunked! First District Rejects All CEQA And Land Use Challenges To Golden State Warriors Event Center Project And EIR In Expedited Litigation
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Drug Company May Use Its Sales Force To Sell Two Rival Products for Now; Irreparable Harm the Issue on Appeal
12 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by randal shaheen
” We will be watching for the Ninth Circuit’s decision and will report it to you. - Randy Miller and Sava Berhane [read post]
Consumer Advertising Law Blog - http://www.consumeradvertisinglawblog.com/