Search for: "New York v. Hill" Results 801 - 820 of 1,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am by Rachel Sachs
Briefly: Yesterday New York City filed an amicus brief in support of Edith Windsor, a New York octogenarian challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:29 am
I would expect this case to become the new "gold standard" (pun partially intended) for fee requests both in New York and in Connecticut for employment law cases.The New York Law Journal (subscription required) reports that in Rozell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Kevin McCarthy refused an interview request from the House select committee on Jan. 6, reports the New York Times. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Where such rulings were broad enough, they tended to create legislative backlash, as happened in New Jersey. [read post]
18 May 2020, 12:49 pm by Renee Knake
The New York Times ran a short piece about President Nixon’s shortlist in 1971, when he faced two vacancies. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak and Michael Shear report that “[t]he court’s decision not to hear the administration’s appeal was expected, as no appeals court has yet ruled on the issue. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
But given the long history and explicit statutory provisions in favor of partnership accountings, the language of a partnership agreement must be unmistakably clear, otherwise chances are strong a withdrawn New York general or limited partner may be able to persuade a court to require his co-partners to render an accounting. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The Washington Post had a piece “Sean Hannity says the New York Times libeled him. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In that case, the family's religious objections to the procedure were made known to physicians at Lenox Hill Hospital but were not made known to the office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York, either when that office was notified of the death or, later, when the body was transferred to the medical examiner. [read post]