Search for: "Notice of Supplemental Authority" Results 801 - 820 of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 9:32 am by Mark Zamora
Specifically, your MMR for (b)(4) fails to declare the identity and weight or measure of several dietary ingredients such as (b)(4) and (b)(4) that are declared on the Supplement Facts label of the dietary supplement. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Dianne Saxe
  Supplement (59 pages) Available: http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2010/2010-10-16/pdf/g1-14442.pdf [iii] See s. 2 of the proposed notice. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 3:16 am by Peter Mahler
She also directed counsel to submit supplemental briefs addressing the interplay of Sections 3.1 (g) and 8.2 of the Operating Agreement as bearing upon the validity of the meeting notice and its proposed member vote to approve a bankruptcy filing, and on whether the LLC Law’s default rules supply an alternative remedy. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:11 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Specifically, the OMB recommended that the FAR be amended: to require contracting officers to put contractors on notice that any TOS [Terms of Service], EULA, or other agreement requiring the government or government-authorized end user to indemnify the contractor for damages, costs, or fees incurred is unenforceable against the government or end-user and will be read out of the agreement to prevent violations of the Antideficiency Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:18 am by Scott R. Anderson
This post supplements their analysis by highlighting a specific ambiguity in how precisely the Trump administration intends to exit the INF Treaty. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 7:11 am by David Oxenford and Robert Primosch
An NCE applicant is required to specify in its application the name of the person contacted about the site, the person’s telephone number, and the person’s authority to give permission (i.e., are they an owner, agent, or authorized representative). [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm by Ray Dowd
"Evidence in a supplemental registration that rebuts information in an original registration similarly rebuts any presumption accorded the facts on the original registration. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The most troubling part was Section 103, which seemed to have been drafted with two inconsistent goals in mind, as if the co-authors were Dr. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am by Thomas B. Griffith
In an opinion authored by Judge Wilkins, and joined by Judge Henderson and Senior Judge Rogers, the Court held that the DOE should have provided notice and comment prior to publishing the supplement because the DOE relied on new literature and evidence that had not been part of the final-rule record. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The most troubling part was Section 103, which seemed to have been drafted with two inconsistent goals in mind, as if the co-authors were Dr. [read post]
Prior to that role, she served as a legal advisor to Commissioner Chopra, with whom she authored an article arguing for expanded use of the FTC’s Section 5 rulemaking authority to supplement antitrust adjudication. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:02 am by Kent Berk
IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, A POWER OF ATTORNEY MUST CONTAIN A NOTICE THAT BY ACCEPTING AUTHORITY UNDER THE POWER OF ATTORNEY THAT THE AGENT IS SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC DUTIES UNDER STATE LAW THAT GOVERNS THE EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY, WHICH MAY INCLUDE DUTIES TO A VULNERABLE ADULT UNDER SECTION 46‑456. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:02 am by Kent Berk
IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, A POWER OF ATTORNEY MUST CONTAIN A NOTICE THAT BY ACCEPTING AUTHORITY UNDER THE POWER OF ATTORNEY THAT THE AGENT IS SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC DUTIES UNDER STATE LAW THAT GOVERNS THE EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY, WHICH MAY INCLUDE DUTIES TO A VULNERABLE ADULT UNDER SECTION 46‑456. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 2:01 am by Editor
Speaking about the level of co-operation of the authorities in the region the Prosecutor stated: "While the judicial authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and in Serbia have stepped up their efforts to try war crimes, the political bodies in Bosnia and Herzegovina and in Serbia have not shown the political will necessary to arrest the remaining fugitives. [read post]