Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 801 - 820 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Originally fashioned to protect police officers, fire fighters and other first responders, the underlying theory is that the governmental actor owes a duty to the public as a whole, not to any individual citizen. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Originally fashioned to protect police officers, fire fighters and other first responders, the underlying theory is that the governmental actor owes a duty to the public as a whole, not to any individual citizen. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This will consider whether the losses suffered by the appellant were losses which the respondent owed a duty to protect him against, and whether they are otherwise recoverable from the respondent. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:24 am by Danielle D'Onfro
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in City of Chicago v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:54 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Director had adequate time to respond to Ms. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether and in what circumstances the UK-domiciled parent company of a multi-national group of companies may owe a common law duty of care to individuals who allegedly suffer serious harm as a result of alleged systemic health, safety and environmental failings of one of its overseas subsidiaries as the operator of a joint venture operation. [read post]