Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 801 - 820 of 1,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
PCAOB accepted a business-driven attack on the body that issues regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley law. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:07 pm by Anthony F. Maul
  Many have noted that the decision—striking down a provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) that provided PCAOB members could only be removed for cause—will have little practical effect in the business world (the Wall Street Journal quotes Office Max’s CFO going so far as to say “[w]hat happens as a consequence of the rulings today is frankly not important”). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:08 am by admin
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued an opinion upholding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:54 am by Broc Romanek
My travel yesterday took a page from "Planes, Trains & Automobiles" - so it was humorous to first see a CNBC text that the stock market was up because the US Supreme Court had stricken the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, only to find out that the 5-4 decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 28, 2010 decision (here), the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:49 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Kurt Schulzke
With today’s SCOTUS decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:02 am by constitutional lawblogger
In another 5-4 and lengthy decision today, the Court declared unconstitutional the formation of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) created as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am by John Elwood
(John Elwood) I have long thought that if the Court invalidated any provision of Sarbanes-Oxley in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]