Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 801 - 820
of 7,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 12:44 am
Note that Administrative Law Judge David P. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am
But both offences are still on the statute book in Northern Ireland, and though Justice Minister Naomi Long has stated that she wants to repeal them, that is a fairly unlikely prospect in the short term, given the current situation in the NI Assembly. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
Those standard terms provide for the anonymity of ‘P’, the adult lacking capacity whose interests are being considered. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Thus, for instance, in Zacchini v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
I wrote long ago that outrage is neither a defense nor a substitute for a carefully planned strategy. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
” (PI0606487-6) “[I]ndependent claim 1 proposed in this opinion was based on example I-1, of the said table, where a composition was described containing elements C, Mn, Si, Al, S, P, Mo, Cr, W and V, being added to this composition the range of element N. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:51 pm
Think Rubix, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
I often quote what I call “Roche’s dictum,” which I heard John P. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:25 am
Stump, 41 Colo. 281, 286–88, 93 P. 17, 19 (1907). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:25 am
Stump, 41 Colo. 281, 286–88, 93 P. 17, 19 (1907). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Payne v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm
"[P]ublic indecency—including public nudity—has long been an offense at common law. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) — infraction — infractions contre la personne — meurtre. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
As Vladimir Putin is hopefully learning, in the long term the question of Ukrainian sovereignty may well be shaped more by international consensus, in terms of how many nations bind together to provide supplies for Ukraine, sanctions against Russia, and support for Ukrainian military responses, than by the forces applied by his cyber threat actors (or his military on the ground). [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:47 am
P. 10(a) ("The title of the complaint must name all the parties. [read post]
