Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 801 - 820 of 2,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 2:32 am by gmlevine
The principal mover for the new construction explained his position in two cases City Views Limited v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am by MBettman
A holding limiting the tort to destruction of physical evidence would miss the point of the tort, as the unavailability of the evidence to the party entitled to it is what the tort is meant to protect. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
  Briefly: In John Crane, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Asbestos Workers Local 84 (DST Insulation, Inc [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
We hold there is no evidence that would have allowed reasonable, fair-minded people to find that the employer and its employees had a meeting of the minds on a fixed amount of pay. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
Think of a city somewhere in the desert where only one company supplies water because it controls the only well in the area. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The two questions on this appeal are whether plaintiff City of New York (the City) is an intended third-party beneficiary of the architectural services contract between plaintiff Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (DASNY) and defendant Perkins Eastman Architects, P.C. [read post]