Search for: "PENN v. PENN."
Results 801 - 820
of 1,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 3:11 pm
In Nicholson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:01 am
[Buffalo News] * Humblebrag of the day by Judge Alsup of Oracle v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:55 am
Fulton v City of Cleveland, 2019 WL 1857107 (OH App. 4/25/2019) [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:25 pm
Although the homeowners argued that the trial court applied the wrong standard, and should have analyzed the undisputed facts under the Penn Central test for a regulatory taking, they hadn’t referred to Penn Central in the Court of Claims, arguing only that ODOT had “‘substantially and materially’ interfered with their use of their property,” and had physically trespassed. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
[The decision the court is referring to is Walsh v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:35 am
Related posts:PA Votes Tomorrow to Eliminate All Funding for Civil Legal Services A brief, but very important update because I’m smack in...Proposal to Include Bar Exam Costs Within Tuition A few days ago, I received the following email from...Symposium: Building the Civilization of Arbitration PENN STATE LAW REVIEW Press Release: The Penn State Law...Khouzam v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
Penn Central Trans. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Their frequent arguments for “church autonomy,” a doctrine the Supreme Court has never embraced, are dangerous for the next generation of children, will keep parents in the dark, and are antithetical to the common good.Controversy 2: The Attack on the Right to Equality in Medical TreatmentThe Supreme Court recently denied certiorari in Minton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm
LEXIS 158 (Penn 2/16/2010) “Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
” Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Ramos v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am
Conservation Commission of Falmouth, 19-223Issues: (1) Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5 percent decline in its value is a sufficient “economic impact” to support a regulatory takings claim under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
Interestingly, the final section of Title V expressly exempts implementation of these student loan changes from negotiated rulemaking. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
In Noghrey v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
Shore:"A Chesapeake v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:54 pm
The Court’s ruling in Doe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
Galarraga v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:01 am
Henry v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:16 am
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
Brief for the Respondent, Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:16 am
Those of you who attended the recent CLE session at the ABA Annual Meeting about Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
