Search for: "PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES"
Results 801 - 820
of 22,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
And, as a backstop, it's a call to the Governor and Legislature to pick up the baton as well -- just in case the courts feel constrained by precedent and/or the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 2:15 pm
In a decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals made on December 20th, Darryl Willard Cain, the defendant-appellant, had his argument that convictions for carjacking and unlawfully driving away in a motor vehicle violated both the Michigan and United States Constitutions rejected. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
The United States Supreme Court in Godinez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:10 pm
The final issue was whether or not DOMA impermissibly discriminated against a class of people in violation of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
You may not have heard of the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:11 am
People v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:19 am
"Writes Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker about the King v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:29 pm
United States should have been a very easy case. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:06 am
In keeping with Sessions declaration of war, the Justice Department filed United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm
Copyright Act, this means the first sale doctrine only applies to copyrighted goods made in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am
United States an anti-commandeering principle with respect to some otherwise valid Commerce Clause laws that infringe on particular aspects of state sovereignty relating to the political process and structure in those states, so, by virtue of the language referring to the people in the Tenth Amendment, it also prohibits mandates that "commandeer the people. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently decided the case of U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Most people are familiar with the application of federal laws in the United States such as the Lanham Act and the Copyright Act in relation to parallel market issues. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
Trump (4th Cir.) and Hawaii v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
