Search for: "POTTER v. POTTER"
Results 801 - 820
of 964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2010, 3:21 pm
FTC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 11:56 am
He described the role of the journalist this way in a short concurrence to a 1980 decision in the case of Houchins v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:59 pm
How about a mandate requiring everyone to see the most recent Harry Potter movie? [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:21 am
” The last Supreme Court recess appointments were during the Eisenhower era: Earl Warren, William Brennan, and Potter Stewart. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
Following up on his previous posts about the Caperton case (here and here), University of Tennessee Professor Alex Long passes along this assessment of the opinion: As you may have heard, the Supreme Court's decision in Caperton v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 7:57 am
Fla.) in Stevens v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 10:39 am
Potter, No. 3:05-CV-108-S, 2007 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” That leaves any potential censorship based on the ridiculous standard which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart advanced for pornography in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm
Buying cars, planes, trains, buses and shoes are just different ways of paying for transportation.How about a mandate requiring everyone to see the most recent Harry Potter movie? [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:28 am
He starts with a quote from the beloved Nino Scalia: Justice Scalia on the rule of lenity in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
While the amendment was aimed primarily at stamping out discrimination against black Americans, it also extends more broadly to what Justice Potter Stewart called “preference based on lineage. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am
It appears to follow Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s test for pornography in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge: Wood v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:57 pm
Our Supreme Court, in Potter v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Jacobellis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 1:28 am
But during an informal chat with high school students the day after the court's ruling in Bush v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
She then lost the group’s support over Weaver v. [read post]
