Search for: "Pack v. Doe" Results 801 - 820 of 1,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
However, under well-established law, commercial for-profit enterprises have not been able to stand in the shoes of their customers who make non-profit or non-commercial uses and to claim the benefit of their transformative non-commercial activities.[3]  This transposition of purpose has been rejected in numerous situations including: The course pack and copyshop cases such as Princeton University Press v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
This in turn helps to rationalize, if it does not explain, the consistent popular aversion to proposals to limit the power of the Supreme Court, as well as the persistent public opposition to President Roosevelt's ill-fated Court-packing plan. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
Ryan provides a “more lenient rule . . . for excusing procedural default” than does Coleman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
The same assumption underlies both canons: Congress is reasonable, so it does not want to violate international law and it does not want people to be less educated. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The plurality that would have reversed Bandemer in the 2004 case of Vieth v. [read post]