Search for: "Parker v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
The case is styled, Texas Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
In Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:02 am
A defendant convicted of multiple drug charges in Fort Lauderdale has had that conviction reversed, and the case remanded for retrial, on the grounds that prejudicial evidence was admitted into in error. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
Parker, 425 F.3d 250, 268 (6th Cir. 2005) (Martin, J., dissenting). [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am
The anti-patent-right-expansion policy of Deepsouth was repeated in Parker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:12 am
United States, 283 F.2d 430 (9th Cir.1960) (threat of damage to property was made merely by mentioning troubles that other contractors had had); People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Like this one.The case is McFadden v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:04 am
As reported in most of the main news outlets this morning, the Administrative Court, wearing the face of Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, handed down its judgment yesterday in R (on the Application of British Telecommunications Plc & TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc) v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), concerning BT and TalkTalk's application for judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:15 am
Parker (1954). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
The State alleged that this further search revealed 38,000 additional names and identifying information.Minassian v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:08 am
In Parker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:08 am
In Parker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 8:54 am
" That is the implication of Parker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:06 am
See Parker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 10:43 am
V. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
V. [read post]
