Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court" Results 801 - 820 of 942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Neil Cahn
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Doe, 2011 ONSC 4663 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ordered an anonymous blogger sued by a defendant in the Lawbuzz defamation case to reveal his or her identity. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
A lawyer for Warren Kinsella argued Friday in Ontario Superior Court the suit from People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier is a strategic action intended to silence expression in the public interest. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division observed that to the extent the father's objection was based on traditional values, meaning that it is Anglo-American custom to give a child the father's name, the objection was not reasonable, because neither parent has a superior right to determine the surname of the child (citing Swank v. [read post]