Search for: "Paul Clement"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 3:31 pm
• Paul Cachia, 'Recent Developments in the sphere of Jurisdiction in Civil and Commercial Matters'. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
” Yesterday, the Heritage Foundation hosted a preview of the upcoming Term with Paul Clement and Kannon Shanmugam. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
• Paul Cachia, 'Recent Developments in the sphere of Jurisdiction in Civil and Commercial Matters'. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:52 am
In response, Paul Clement argued for the plaintiffs that although there was no Rule 23 when the Sherman Act was enacted, procedures were in place at that time that would allow multiple claims to be heard together, and the AmEx arbitration provision does not allow joinder of multiple claims in arbitration. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:20 pm
In a spirited and interesting oral argument, on behalf of Oracle, Paul Clement argued that reading the word "full" out of Section 505 and reading 1920's cramped view of "costs" (ie taxable costs) as "full costs" would do "carnage" to the statute and common grammar. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
Fox News has hired former United States Solicitor General Paul Clement to represent it. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm
CLEMENT: I represent 26 States. [read post]
2 May 2021, 9:59 am
At the start of his argument on behalf of PennEast, Paul Clement quickly pointed out that there were no doubts that the federal government’s eminent domain power could be delegated, or as he framed it, private parties could be “deputized” to use the eminent domain power. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:57 am
Two days later, on Feb. 21, Judge Ho issued a written decision appointing Paul Clement (an esteemed conservative appellate lawyer) as an amicus to represent the opposing side– that is to present any factual or legal arguments as to how the court should proceed. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:39 am
Paul Clement makes the same points in greater detail in his Supreme Court brief for the plaintiffs (pp. 51-64). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
Yet as Paul Clement noted in yesterday’s oral argument (and we’ve noted repeatedly), there are many other ways of ensuring that those in need are able to obtain medical care and even of encouraging more Americans to obtain health insurance. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that former Solicitor General Paul Clement’s announcement that his Bancroft firm would merge with Kirkland and Ellis “took the rarified U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 8:35 pm
Solicitor General Paul Clement — to help his lawyers with the redistricting fight. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:55 pm
That was the second question presented in Boumediene, and it was briefed by Paul Clement and Seth Waxman, but the Court did not reach it. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 6:44 am
See, for example, then-Deputy Solicitor General Paul Clement's able efforts on behalf of McCain-Feingold during the Bush administration. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:17 pm
So Lopez de Victoria may present us with the question of whether the Kabul Klipper has the guts to unbolt the Golden CAAF from his mantle and actually mail it to Paul Clement. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
In Monday’s oral argument, Paul Clement, on behalf of Axon, stated that the company is “challenging the constitutionality of statutes that insulate agency officials” and violate due process rights by “denying access to courts. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:59 am
. ________ 1:07: Audio of the oral argument has now concluded on C-SPAN3. is available here. 1:00: Seth Waxman, the detainees’ lawyer, has begun his rebuttal on the C-SPAN feed (links below). 12:18: Solicitor General Paul Clement has now begun his portion of the argument on the C-SPAN feed (links below). 11:43: Audio of the oral argument has now begun on C-SPAN3. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm
Paul Clement, former Solicitor General in the Bush Administration, was hired at taxpayer expense. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:05 pm
We have occasionally invited non-academics to speak on various topics --- the most successful of these slightly less traditional talks being (in my opinion) when then-Solicitor General Paul Clement spoke to the faculty about recent trends in the Supreme Court docket and decisions. [read post]
