Search for: "People v Comfort" Results 801 - 820 of 2,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2018, 4:30 am by Jennifer Rothman
In 1905 the Supreme Court of Georgia agreed in Pavesich v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gov’t influencing/coercing speech is something we’re not comfortable with. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[Then there’s no point in requiring people to use one rather t [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:04 pm by rstokes
In particular, there were improvements in personal care, positioning, and comfort. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Rena Steinzor
Of course, knowledge is not an element that needs to be proved in civil cases, although the existence of such evidence may make courts more comfortable. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]