Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 12:45 am
" Zorach v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 November 2019 Warby J handed down a judgment in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB) finding that a MailOnline article made a defamatory allegation against the claimant, a Conservative Member of the House of Lords. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal (5-2; Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale giving strong dissenting judgments). [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Yet people sometimes cite science when they are trying to justify their own oppressive behavior. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s report on Large Language Models has concluded it is not “fair for tech firms to use rightsholder data for commercial purposes without permission or compensation, and to gain vast financial rewards in the process”. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
At a meeting held in the House of Lords on 8 June 2022, the Campaign group FAIR (Falsely Accused Individuals for Reform) called for pre-charge naming of sexual offence suspects to be made a criminal offence in England and Wales. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
It is inevitable…that there will always be some people who can and will ‘join up the dots’, although that is not to imply that they can publish their conclusion. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The result – which was positive for GS – is potentially of considerable assistance for similar people. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
He has also published an anthology entitled ‘Muselings; A Young man’s Meditations on Life, People and Growing up’ and several newspaper articles. 48 HOUR RULE: RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE; THE JUDICIARY SHOULD LET US KNOW! [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
On Tuesday the Court will also hear the appeal of The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) – a challenge of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, Pt 4, which introduces a “named person service” requiring providers of children’s services to make available an identified individual whose general function is to promote, support or safeguard the wellbeing of each child or young person, on behalf of the service… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
The approach in law is that set out by Lord Steyn in Re S and in respect of the requirement for ‘compelling reasons’ the judgment in A v Ward must be regarded as per incuriam and should not be followed. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Barrister Keir Monteith, for Norman, told the three-judge panel, led by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, that the appeal hinged on the decision of Mirror Group Newspapers to “give up” details of the prison officer. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
As Lord Reid explained in that case, at p 1033, Julius v Bishop of Oxford 5 App Cas 214 is itself authority for going behind the words which confer a statutory power to the general scope and objects of the Act in order to find what was intended. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
See Prince v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:11 am
“People v Donald ….mmm, hang on, how is that pronounced? [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:48 am
Particularly of note was the 2024 Veirein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am
Presumably, this will be on the agenda for Lord Neuberger’s upcoming review of libel law. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
Odone is referring to Johns & Anor, R (on the application of) v Derby City Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin). [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
